New Delhi NCR: On August 11, 2025, India’s Supreme Court issued a landmark directive ordering the removal of all stray dogs, whether sterilised or not, from Delhi and the NCR. The dogs must be relocated to shelters within 6 to 8 weeks and cannot be returned to the streets.
The court also instructed authorities to set up shelters equipped with adequate staff and CCTV cameras, launch a helpline for dog bite complaints, and form special enforcement teams. The order comes amid alarming statistics: Delhi alone records around 2,000 dog bite cases every day, and nationwide, 430,000 dog bite incidents were reported in January 2025. Prioritising public safety, especially for children, the court warned of strict legal action against anyone obstructing the implementation.
Voices in support
Several Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs) and sections of the public welcomed the decision, calling it a necessary step to ensure safety. Delhi Cabinet Minister Kapil Mishra also backed the order, stating that both human safety and animal welfare will be considered.
ALSO READ –https://apartmenttimes.in/scs-8-week-stray-dog-deadline-can-delhi-ncr-deliver/
Criticism and concerns
Animal rights groups and experts have strongly opposed the move, citing practical and ethical issues:
PETA India called the decision “illogical, impractical, and illegal,” arguing that forced removals will not solve the problem, violate Animal Birth Control (ABC) rules, and disrupt community–dog relationships.
FIAPO (Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations) urged large-scale sterilisation, vaccination, and waste management as the real long-term solution.
Former Union Minister and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi said the plan is “financially unviable,” estimating it would cost ₹15,000 crore to house all of Delhi’s stray dogs.
Experts also warned of the “vacuum effect,” where new and possibly more aggressive dogs enter cleared territories, increasing the risk of attacks and zoonotic diseases.
Political and Public Reactions
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi condemned the blanket removal order as “cruel” and a step backwards from humane, science-based solutions. He called for a balanced approach that ensures both public safety and compassion for animals.
Social media platforms are witnessing sharp divisions—some users advocate for adoption and community care, while others demand immediate removal to protect children. The order has also triggered protests at India Gate, leading to the detention of several animal rights activists.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s directive marks a decisive and urgent attempt to curb rising dog bite incidents, but it has intensified the debate between human safety and animal rights. Supporters see it as essential, while critics call it costly, inhumane, and ineffective in the long run.
The coming weeks will reveal whether a middle path—combining safety with humane treatment—can be found as authorities move to act on the court’s order.