Noida: In a significant observation that has stirred debate across urban India, the Supreme Court of India on July 15, 2025, questioned the practice of feeding stray dogs in public spaces. The remarks came during a hearing of a petition filed by Reema Shah, a Noida resident, who alleged harassment for feeding strays under the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023.
A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta questioned Shah’s insistence on feeding dogs in public areas and emphasised public safety concerns over personal sentiment.
Why don’t you feed them in your house? Nobody’s stopping you - The Bench
There is space for these animals, but no space for humans. Should we open a separate lane on every street for large-hearted people to feed stray dogs and cows?
The Bench
The bench expressed alarm at the increasing number of stray dog attacks and noted the dangers posed to morning walkers, cyclists, and children.
Try cycling in the morning and see what happens !
Justice Nath remarked, highlighting the urgent need for regulated feeding practices.
The Legal Standpoint
Shah’s petition challenged the lack of designated feeding zones in Noida, even as Greater Noida authorities had implemented such areas. Her counsel cited a 2021 Delhi High Court order that directed RWAs and civic authorities to ensure feeders are protected and feeding spots are set in consultation with the Animal Welfare Board of India.
However, the Supreme Court shifted the conversation, asserting that compassion must be exercised responsibly. The bench clarified that they were not against animal care, but called for feeders to adopt structured, accountable solutions such as home shelters.
Municipal Response and Policy Shift
The court’s strong remarks prompted the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to urgently convene a standing committee meeting. Key decisions under consideration include:
- Identifying dedicated feeding zones away from pedestrian-heavy areas
- Setting up stray dog shelters using underutilised land parcels
- Launching a comprehensive dog census
- Strengthening sterilisation and vaccination programs
MCD officials acknowledged that public complaints about stray dog bites and feeder disputes have surged, especially in areas like Noida, Ghaziabad, and Gurugram.
A Divided Society: Safety vs. Sentiment
On the ground, the issue remains deeply polarising. RWAs often struggle to mediate between animal lovers and residents concerned about safety. On social platforms like Reddit, citizens shared frustrations:
If every dog lover adopted one stray, there wouldn’t be a stray problem.
The Bench
Feeding dogs in parks and near schools has made it unsafe for children.
The Bench
On the other hand, animal welfare activists warn that demonizing feeders or removing strays could violate legal protections and encourage cruelty.
Looking Ahead: What’s at Stake?
Here’s your table refined and correctly formatted for clarity and alignment:
| Issue | Court’s View |
|---|---|
| Public Safety | Feeding in crowded public areas poses serious risks to walkers, cyclists, and children. |
| Legal Protection for Feeders | Must be balanced with civic order and the rights of other residents. |
| Municipal Accountability | Civic bodies must create shelters, define feeding zones, and strengthen sterilization efforts. |
| Compassion in Action | Feeders should take personal responsibility—ideally by feeding at home or within structured setups. |
The Supreme Court has now directed that Shah’s plea be heard along with similar cases pending across India, signalling a possible unified policy on stray dog management in the coming months.
Conclusion
The Court’s firm but fair stance has made one thing clear: kindness must coexist with accountability. As cities grow and public spaces shrink, India’s stray dog challenge can no longer be left to individual goodwill. What’s needed now is a national framework—backed by civic bodies, courts, and communities—that ensures safety for people and dignity for animals.
Feeding stray dogs near the main gate or within residential societies can pose safety and hygiene concerns, particularly for children and the elderly. It may lead to dogs becoming territorial or aggressive, increasing the risk of accidents near entry and exit points. The Supreme Court has also highlighted the importance of feeding strays in a responsible manner. It’s advisable to feed them at safe, designated areas away from society gates to ensure the well-being of both residents and animals.
Manish Tripathi, Resident, Cherry County, GNW
I support the Supreme Court’s balanced stance. Feeding stray dogs is an act of compassion, but it must be done responsibly. The right approach is to balance kindness with public safety. Providing food in safe, designated areas or at home is both practical and humane.
Azeem Khan, Resident, ATS Nobility
As responsible citizens and as animal lovers, we must find a middle path.
Rashmi Pandey, Social Worker
Streets and parks are for safe public movement, not for fear or attacks.
Compassion for animals is vital, but it should go hand in hand with order, safety, and accountability.
Feeding stray animals should be done in a structured and secure manner — with respect for all lives involved.
The Supreme Court’s observation is timely and much-needed — both for civic order and responsible animal care.